Select Page

Steven Singer: If Churches Get Public Funds, They Should Pay Taxes and Anticipate Government Regulation | Diane Ravitch’s Blog

I couldn’t agree more:

“What conservatives seem to forget is that the wall of separation between church and state wasn’t erected just to protect the state from influence by religion. It also was set up to protect religion from the state.” ~ Diane Ravitch 

Advertisements

15 Comments

  1. John Fioravanti

    I agree with all of you, but being the heretic that I am, I’m not sympathetic to the causes of any of these religions.

    Reply
  2. smilecalm

    perhaps a long conversation
    between Jesus, the NYSE,
    Congress & all citizens
    is overdue, JoAnn 🙂

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      Some people say Jesus’ return is overdue. But when He does return, it will not be televised.

      Reply
  3. GarryRogers

    Churches should have been paying taxes for many years. They must abide by certain restrictions to retain their tax-exempt status. The restriction they often violate is the prohibition on political campaigning. From the IRS.gov website: “Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.”

    Reply
  4. Robert A. Vella

    Ravitch’s point is spot on, although I would never underestimate the lengths at which conservatives will go to twist the rules in their favor. From my perspective, conservative ideology – whether cultural or economic – is fundamentally authoritarian and therefore antithetical to democracy and the rule of law (i.e. republicanism). If the tax issue is raised as the separation of church and state is dismantled, conservatives will simply legislate a tax exemption for churches or just refuse to enforce the existing law.

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      Excellent explanation. I suppose authoritarian rule could follow laws and respect principles, but it is generally lawless due to human weakness. This is one reason why democracy is so important, the participation of many helps maintain objectivity, avoid corruption, and keep things fair.

      Reply
  5. ashiftinconsciousness

    I agree completely. Trinity Church in Downtown Manhattan has billions of dollars in real estate holdings around NYC. And lots of people live in the streets. Just imagine what could be done with some of that money…

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      Yes. It’s about the same for the big ivy league universities.

      Reply

Please add your thoughts and feelings...

Categories

Archives

Advertisements

Shares, Comments & Awards

It’s always delightful to see that someone has shared one of my posts on their social networks. Thank you. I will try to return the favor. ♥

Please feel free to leave honest, constructive comments, or witty remarks. Your thoughts and feelings are important feedback to myself and other readers. ♥

This blog is award-free (unless a cash prize is involved). 😊 Still, thanks for thinking of me! ♥

Copyright

Copyright © 2013-17 • All Rights Reserved • JoAnnChateau.com

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: