In the video above, Attorney Jared H. Beck clarifies Judge Zloch’s dismissal of the DNC fraud lawsuit, which may be confusing for those of us who are not lawyers. Laypeople, if you mentally insert “for the sake of argument” before the judge’s preface to his explanation of the legal particulars that led him to dismiss the case, you get a better sense of where he was going.

“The Court thus assumes [for the sake of argument] that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial.” ~ Florida Federal Judge William Zloch

Judge Zloch neither agreed nor disagreed with the plaintiffs’ charge. Neither did he throw the case out. Beck’s legal team is presently determining whether or not they will appeal in a higher court. Beck and Jimmy Dore discuss the issues.

You can read Judge Zloch’s entire dismissal statement here: Case 0:16-cv-61511-WJZ Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 

Aware and Fair


%d bloggers like this: