Select Page

Prof. Larry Lessig Is Fighting for ‘One-Person-One-Vote’

In the above video, 2016 presidential candidate Prof. Larry Lessig talks with TYT host Cenk Uygur about his ongoing Equal Votes campaign (i.e., one-person-one-vote.) It’s a stimulating discussion! Along the way, Lessig offers an intriguing insight into the 2016 Democratic Primary. He says, if the DNC had not changed the debate rules (thus eliminating his chance to join the Democratic presidential debates), Hillary Clinton would have won the General Election. Take a listen, to understand what he means.

The nitty-gritty of the Equal Votes campaign is explained in the short video below:

“We have a plan to challenge the Electoral College in the Supreme Court, and we believe we can win—even in time for the 2020 election.” ~ Equal Citizens


One-Person-One-Vote

 

Advertisements
Advertisements

About The Author

JoAnn Chateau

JoAnn Chateau likes progressive politics and loves the canines. She writes fiction about an alpha Bichon named Chester, and his friends--with a dash of humor and a dab of poli-sci. JoAnn worked professionally in the Psychology and Information Science fields. Retired now, she enjoys the creative life.

6 Comments

  1. Animalista Untamed

    We have a system here in the UK too where an individual’s vote doesn’t count. I live in a constituency which is solidly Tory, so it makes no difference how I vote, or even whether I vote. So much for democracy.

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      Seems like the ruling elites don’t want the masses to upset the status quo they enjoy.

      Reply
  2. Robert A. Vella

    Although I dislike hero-worship, Lessig comes very close in my book.

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      Yes. Perhaps not worthy of worship, Lessig is certainly one of our American heroes. If there’s any hope for us, it’s because of thinkers and political activists like him.

      Reply
  3. Carl D'Agostino

    I do not want the people of 20 cities in a dozen states electing the president of the whole country. One man-one vote seems to make sense on the surface but that combination disenfranchises the rest of the voters and is one reason 4 of the first 5 presidents was from Virginia. It is more democratic to have 50 little elections than just one. If it’s one man- one vote a candidate need not waste time campaigning in 38 states or address particular concerns of those people. The people of those cities are mostly on welfare and they will vote for the “welfare” candidate not ones who have the future of the nation at heart.

    Reply
    • JoAnn Chateau

      As Lessig explains, one-man-one-vote would cause candidates to campaign in every state – something few do now.

      Reply

Your input makes the world turn!

Subscribe to the ...

Advertisements

Categories

Archives

Advertisements

Shares, Comments, Re-Blogs & Awards

Thank you for sharing my posts with your social network. If I’m on the same network, I’ll strive to return the favor. ♥

Feel free to make constructive and/or witty comments. I usually follow fellow-bloggers who regularly add to the discussion. ♥

You may re-blog an excerpt without asking permission. Due to custom theme and plugins, the ‘Re-Blog’ button will not display — so use ‘Press This’ to re-blog ♥

This blog is award-free. Still, thanks for thinking of me! ♥

~ JoAnn

Copyright

Copyright © 2013-17 • All Rights Reserved • JoAnnChateau.com

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: